Introduction
I worked on my first public
service campaign in 1962. I had just joined the Benton
& Bowles agency, and they had the American Red Cross
account, a pro bono assignment from the Advertising
Council. The project was tossed to agroup of us juniors,
and we were thrilled to get it. Nobody up the corporate
ladder paid much attention to it, having bigger and more
profitable fish to fry. We did a modest radio campaign.
It was fine, but not inspired. I was amazed at how
quickly it was approved.
The creative team on the
campaign was invited to the Advertising Council's annual
Spring luncheon at the Waldorf. While watching
presentations of their various campaigns, I found myself
suddenly exposed to a whole parallel world of advertising
"contributed for the public good" as the Ad
Council slogan proclaimed.
Some of it deeply touched
and motivated me, and a bit of it was just
ordinary. I realized then and there, that it was possible
to use the techniques of marketing in a way that could
have an important and beneficial impact on the public; a
result that had nothing to do with detergent or analgesic
market share, the things that consumed me during most
hours of my workday. And I got very excited about that. I
also realized that to do it right took some special
skills.
Thirty years later, after
retiring from a Creative Director post at Saatchi &
Saatchi, I went back to see the folks at the Ad Council
about a campaign for a small foundation. There on the
wall, directly behind the receptionist, was a huge
blow-up of a poster featuring Iron Eyes Cody, the
"Crying Indian" for the Keep America Beautiful
campaign.
I remembered standing beside
Director Mike Elliot as that famous scene was filmed. I
had heard the camera whir as the sun cleared a cloud and
illuminated that beautiful man's face, picking up
highlights on the carefully placed teardrop.
This was clearly a campaign the
Ad Council felt represented the best of its genre.
Standing in their lobby face to face once again with Iron
Eyes, I developed a tear of my own. I was reminded of
that lunch 30 years earlier, and the idealistic
aspirations of a young copywriter.
I hasten to add, I didn't create
the "Crying Indian." But as a newly-hired
Creative Director at Marsteller Advertising, the agency
that did, I resurrected him from the "old
campaign" file where he had been put aside after one
year's airing, and wrote a new series of commercials and
ads for him. Through the years he has became a true
public service icon, right up there with Smokey Bear and
McGruff the Crime Dog; listed as one of the "Best
Commercials of the Century" by Advertising Age;
selected as "One of the fifty greatest commercials
of all time" by both Entertainment Weekly and
TV Guide. After a long hiatus, it was revived
again for the nineties. More of that story later.
Doing Well By Doing Good
The relegating of public service campaigns to "step
child" status, handled by agency juniors, has long
since passed. Today the best and the brightest creative
teams fight to get those assignments, with visions of
Gold Lions and Clios decorating their bookshelves. And I
also believe that most of them sincerely hunger for the
opportunity to serve the public good with their talents.
The working title of this book
was "Pro Bono," from the Latin phrase pro
bono Publico which translates as "for the public
good," and the art of applying carefully strategized
marketing to serving the public good is
certainly what this book is about. However, pro bono is a
description generally applied by the industry to work
done by advertising practitioners gratis or at cost as a
donation to a just cause. Since there has recently been
an explosion of cause marketing campaigns created by
agencies for a normal fee, and placed in media that is
paid for rather than donated, it was decided that the
more inclusive title "The Art of Cause
Marketing" would be more appropriate.
What is Cause Marketing?
Cause marketing consists of
using the skills of advertising to effect social change;
to benefit individuals or society at large. To re-state
the classic definition, it is advertising in the service
of the public.
Cause Marketing seeks to impact
personal behavior in a number of ways. Among these are:
- Avoidance or
discontinuance of risky practices like
smoking or drug abuse or unprotected sex
- Discontinuance of
anti-social actions such as littering or
carelessness with campfires;
- Seeking counseling for
destructive behavior such as compulsive
gambling or spousal abuse;
- Taking preventative
measures such as getting inoculated,
reducing cholesterol intake, or fastening
a safety belt;
- Seeking out and using
information about various diseases;
- Re-examining personal
attitudes toward issues like race and
sexual preference;
- Identifying and taking
action against inhumane or discriminatory
practices;
- Organizing, joining,
and giving financial support to groups
that benefit our society:
- Becoming involved in
community activities such as mentoring
and monitoring neighborhood crime.
|
Cause marketing can also help to create or change public
policy. In short, when properly employed, cause
marketing informs about, and creates action on behalf of
a cause.
Advertising which does that is
also widely classified as "Social Marketing."
However the term seemed too general for a practical text
on making ads for causes, which is what this book was
meant to be. The theoretical side of Social
Marketing has been dealt with in a number of texts.
But Doctor Howard Shaffer, Director, Division on
Addictions at Harvard Medical School told me: "We
have enough learned tomes and intellectual papers from
people like me. What we most need now is a how-to guide.
What we need is a 'Cook Book!' " So a "Cook
Book" this shall be!
"Cause-related
Marketing" is a label that has been defined by
Kotler and Andreasen in their book "Strategic
Marketing for Non-Profit Organizations" as "any
effort by a corporation to increase its own sales by
contributing to the objectives of one or more nonprofit
organizations." We will touch on that sub-segment in
Chapter eight.
This is a
text written primarily for advertising professionals and
students of advertising and communications. Public agency
and private foundation administrators should also find it
helpful to the performance of their roles as
"clients" of the work of those professionals.
It will be a guide for anyone who is charged with using
the tools of marketing to impact public policy or private
behavior.
Because it will not advocate a
radical departure from many of the basic tenets of
advertising, it can be a good fundamental text for any
student of the craft. Advertising is advertising,
and most of the fundamental principals of strategy, art
direction and copywriting, and research apply to this
category as well. However, what makes the difference in
most public service advertising is the complex
psychological makeup of the target "consumer"
for these messages.
To change deeply held public
attitudes, one needs a thorough understanding of the
belief systems and motivations of the targets of that
effort. And this requires sophisticated research, plus
some very finely honed strategic and creative skills.
For example, most good product
selling lines or slogans are fairly simple and
straightforward. They generally present factual evidence
of a product's superiority in language that is hopefully
mind-opening and memorable. But product selling lines
usually don't come with deep psychological underpinnings.
Cause advertising almost always does. Often it targets
people who are addicted to drugs, alcohol, tobacco, or
gambling. These targets of cause campaigns are
frequently in denial about their problems, and therefore
ostensibly uninterested in your message. When cause
campaign themes or slogans fail, it is more than likely
because they contain no psychological or emotional
"hook." The goal of most commercial advertising
is simply that of changing purchasing patterns. The cause
marketing campaign seeks to change strongly ingrained
behavior or firmly held beliefs.
Is it Art?
Is it a little pompous to call
this pursuit an "art?" I don't think so.
It
goes to a core difference between this type of
advertising and product or service messages, a difference
I will touch on in some detail in this book. That
difference is why I believe even experienced
practitioners of
advertising can benefit from the principles outlined in
this book.
An experienced art
director-writer team can routinely produce an effective
packaged goods campaign. If they are good, the work may
be artful, but rarely is it art.
True art is something that moves
people in important emotional and personal ways; that
stays with them, and possibly affects their lives. Every
year, the advertising award shows select a few product or
service campaigns or ads that are truly works of art, and
they are appropriately enshrined.
But because the consequences are
so far-reaching, it is very important that every piece of
cause marketing be as crafted as carefully as a serious
work of art! Because its objective is always to move
people emotionally and affect their lives.
In addition to the strictly
"pro bono" efforts, many "for-fee"
cause
campaigns are funded these days by increased taxes
mandated by voter initiatives or by settlement monies
from groups such as the tobacco industry. The result has
usually been more professionally- produced work that runs
in prime time paid media , as opposed to the typical
Public Service Announcement (PSA) that often gets stuck
in between the infomercials at 4:00AM. This, as we shall
see later, is probably the wave of the future.
During a long career at various
advertising agencies I have done some public service
campaigns that were strictly pro bono, and some that were
handled like any commercial account, earning the agency
an appropriate fee. While the scope and complexity of
that work has varied according to the size of the budget,
the principles behind it are exactly the same.
Throughout those thirty-five
years in advertising, I always eagerly sought cause
marketing assignments. Even when working on standard
agency packaged goods accounts, I sometimes found myself
dealing with public issues on behalf of corporate
clients, such as the daunting task of having to write
"recovery" campaigns after the two Tylenol
poisoning incidents. These were not product benefit
spots; they had the tough objective of sustaining
positive public attitudes about a product that had
suddenly become a murder weapon, thus they required that
extra level of sophistication essential to most cause
campaigns.
Recently, I have devoted
virtually all of my time to advising cause
marketing efforts. And it was during this period that I
started to organize
the precepts that will form the core of this book.
I served as Advertising
Consultant to the Massachusetts Department of Public
Health for their 12 million-dollar tax-funded
anti-smoking campaign, and have also helped to develop
campaigns for the Massachusetts Council on Compulsive
Gambling, and the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection, among others.
Because of my total immersion in
the Massachusetts Tobacco Control campaign, and knowledge
of all aspects of its planning and execution, I have
chosen to employ a large number of examples and
illustrations from that effort. However, I do believe
that they have relevance to campaigns in support of many
other kinds of causes. A detailed case study of that
campaign may be found in Chapter Ten.
"Let's Do Some Ads"
The number of cause marketing
campaigns is ever increasing. In fact, because of the
dominant role of the media in all our lives, sooner or
later, almost every public interest group will say:
"Let's do some ads!"
Some of the resulting work is
still produced quickly and cheaply by
unsophisticated PR people or small creative services,
with its quality and effectiveness often diminished due
to funding limitations and the lack of experience of its
creators.
These are generally the
exception today, however, as noted above, to well-funded
campaigns like the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program
or the efforts of the Partnership for a Drug Free
America.
However, even for-fee efforts
from major agencies can fail, often due to the fact that
merely applying the principles that successfully sell
packaged goods or consumer services. As a result, we are
flooded daily with a glut of well-intentioned cause ads,
many of which fall far short of their worthy but complex
objectives. In fact, much of that work may actually be
counter-productive, nourishing cynicism among the very
populations it is attempting to reach, and fortifying
barriers against the next media effort by anyone who
dares to suggest a modification of their behavior.
For example, certainly Nancy
Reagan was sincere about her anti-drug efforts aimed at
the young. But her expansion of the "Just say
no!" campaign (originally targeted to pre-teens) to
all potential drug users was so simplistic and
unconcerned about the psychological forces that
contribute to teenage drug experimentation that we must
assume that most of those older kids merely laughed at
it. As a very hip young man commented on MTV one
night, "It's a little like telling a manic
depressive to 'cheer up!' "
Then, as if no one had
learned anything in 10 years, Bob Dole, while raising the
issue of increased drug use among the young in his 1996
Presidential campaign, proudly unveiled the slogan
"Just Don't Do It!" That simplistic line
also committed the offense of clumsily mimicking a
carefully crafted youth campaign for Nike Athletic Shoes
("Just Do It!").
Lest this seem an overly
harsh judgment of my former colleagues at the large
agencies, let me state that I have made many of the same
mistakes myself. My first major national public service
campaign, the well-funded anti-drug abuse effort for the
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), was a flawed
effort.
I was at that time an
experienced Creative Vice President at a top ten agency,
and I was very proud of what we did. We won over 20
prestigious industry awards with that effort, including a
Gold Lion at the Cannes festival. There is no question
but that this highly visible campaign had a positive
effect on my career as an advertising executive, yet,
looking back at it today, I shudder at some of the
mistakes we made.
For example, we graphically
depicted drug use in some grim inner-city billboards.
They were strikingly shot, and the headline:
"Slavery 1969" was strong. But the image of a
needle in the arm could have been a "turn-on"
to a heroin user, and those posters should never have
been produced.
We
also preached against marijuana use with the same
intensity and with the same language and theme lines with
which we railed against heroin. The result was that it
looked as if we were lacking in any knowledge of our
subject. Clearly the severity of the effects and the
potential dangers of each are quite different. So when we
took the same hard line on the effects of marijuana use
as we did on heroin, we lost credibility with our
youthful audience. It was all "drugs" and it
was all equally destructive. I had actually tried to have
the anti-pot spots eliminated from our campaign. But I
was told that since it was an official government
campaign, we couldn't avoid it.
When the U.S. State Department
called me some years later and asked me to travel with
National Institute of Drug Abuse Director Robert DuPont
to participate in an international conference on using
the media to combat drug abuse, I accepted only on the
basis that they allow me to air our mistakes.
Surprisingly, they agreed, and I did an elaborate
"mea culpa" in what was hopefully, a
constructive presentation.
Among other things I told them
was that if you have, say, ten million
dollars to spend in the media on drug abuse, then perhaps
you should
reallocate nine million of those dollars to creating
counseling and
treatment programs, and use the balance in the media to
advertise the
availability of those services. To try and significantly
stem the spread of
drug addiction in thirty seconds on TV or in a half page
ad is very difficult. Not impossible, but difficult.
Sadly, today, more than 20 year
later, many of the same mistakes continue to be repeated
by respected advertising professionals. And if a public
service campaign loses credibility with its target, it
may lose everything. Those of us who have learned
these lessons the hard way must take the responsibility
of disseminating that learning, and hopefully avoid
repeating those mistakes.
How to do it right.
The following pages summarize
lessons learned from years of personal experience. During
that time I estimate that I have been involved in the
creation of over 1000 broadcast commercials, and an equal
number of print, outdoor, and promotional pieces. I
sometimes think that whatever could possibly happen
during the production of advertising has happened to me
at one time or other. I hope a retelling of some of the
things I learned while living through those crises can
help you navigate similar ones. And more to the point, I
believe the lessons learned from the number of cause
campaigns with which I have been involved can help you
steer clear of the many pitfalls inherent in this very
specialized kind of advertising.
This book analyzes many examples
of advertising in the cause marketing category that I
consider effective, plus some that have fallen short.
Part I lays out the steps
required to land and then develop a successful cause
campaign.
The first chapter deals with some
crucial considerations that must be
addressed before any work can be created. I will discuss
standard procedures used by cause committees in selecting
an advertising agency for this type of account, and what
factors you should consider in creating a winning agency
"pitch."
Chapter Two covers the
importance of campaign planning and strategy, starting
with such intertwined elements as budget and media. And
moving on to the crucial step of assembling the building
blocks of a strong simple strategy, including the
often-overlooked but crucial areas of tone and style.
To help you further understand
the addicted target, probably your most difficult
challenge, Chapter Three explores the psychology of that
special population.
Chapter Four is an overview of
the nuts and bolts of the creative process, including the
client presentation, with special attention paid to those
factors that separate cause campaigns and cause clients
from their for-profit cousins. The significance of logos
and campaign themes to cause campaigns will be discussed.
And the special place of campaign icons in cause
marketing will also be covered, as we pay homage to
Smokey and McGruff and Iron Eyes Cody.
Chapter Five discusses
television production for a cause campaign, with some
thoughts about such matters as casting, (including when
to resist the urge to hire a celebrity spokesperson,) and
how to achieve first-rate broadcast production on a low
public service budget.
Chapter Six covers the special
factors that go into making effective cause radio, print
and outdoor advertising and how these differ from the
creation of broadcast advertising.
Copy research is arguably more
important to a cause effort than to any other type of
marketing. How much better to predict if your campaign
will work in concept stage than to find out it didn't
after the fact. Chapter Seven contains information about
qualitative research: concept testing, focus groups, and
mall intercepts and summarizes two case studies from the
realm of issue advertising that were entirely driven by
some fairly innovative research. Copy evaluation plays an
especially significant role in cause marketing, since the
simple tools of sales figures and growth or decline of
market share, surefire indicators of the effectiveness of
a commercial product campaign are missing. Yet, proof of
effectiveness is crucial to the placement and funding of
most cause campaigns. Chapter Seven will include a
discussion of quantitative research and tracking, as it
applies to a cause effort. Also covered will be
techniques of effectively reaching special populations
such as minority communities.
Chapter Eight covers the
importance of preparing an efficient media plan,
including the pros and cons of going the PSA route vs.
buying a paid media schedule, and contains a look at the
new opportunities in on-line media.
Part 2 is a critical review of
some of the most visible cause marketing efforts, with an
analysis of how attention to, or a disregard for the
principles explored in Part I may have contributed to
successes or missteps in these campaigns.
The role of the Advertising
Council in implementing and helping to place PSAs will be
discussed in Chapter Nine, plus some ways to get your
message out when you have virtually no budget.
Chapter Nine is an analysis of
the extensive work of that "Cause Colossus,"
the Partnership for a Drug Free America, America's
best-funded and most visible cause campaign. And
Chapter Ten will be a detailed case study of the
Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program.
Chapter Eleven is a "top
ten" list of effective cause advertising, and
Chapter Twelve will a summary with some final thoughts.
The book touches briefly
on the areas of PR and promotions, corporate sponsorship,
direct mail and fund raising. While these are all
potentially important to any cause effort, they usually
require the expertise of specialists, and those
activities are usually sub-contracted out to those
specialists by cause agencies.
For the benefit of
administrators of cause marketing and students and
others outside the advertising profession, a bit of
"Advertising 101" will
be included. I will lay out what I believe a good
client needs to know to
judge the effectiveness of the plan and the brief, the
strategy, and the
finished work. Even if your cause organization has the
funding to hire a
large full-service agency, judging that work will be
easier if those
principles are understood.
First, Do no Harm
I believe it is crucial that
everyone involved with cause marketing take these
principles seriously, and carefully examine every
communication they place before the public. Failure to do
so may result in something much worse than just falling
short of your objective. Daily, we see well-financed and
beautifully produced public service advertising from
experienced full-service agencies that may actually be
counter-productive.
A recent cause commercial
produced by a mainstream agency, and titled "The
Burbs" showed a nicely dressed white pre-teen
skateboarding through a neat suburban cul de sac.
"Statistics show that 40%
of all kids who smoke marijuana are inner city youth.
Guess who the other 60% are? " says the voice-over.
The kid winds up with some peers, and they start passing
around a joint and toking expertly on it. Of course, the
strategy was to shock middle class suburban parents into
action. These could be their kids; they'd better
wake up and talk to them about drugs. But what about the
kids watching over their shoulder? The teens in the spot
look like sensible kids having a wonderful time.
Marijuana use appears normal. Quite appealing. But
since media buys cannot be targeted precisely enough to
eliminate youthful viewers, it's likely that sending the
unintended message to the kids -one that essentially
normalizes youthful pot smoking- will outweigh the
benefit of shocking the parents.
It is amazing how often
"the product" (that passed-around
"joint", drug paraphernalia, lit cigarettes,
gambling activities) is portrayed in ads directed to
abusers or compulsive users. Old habits die hard, and one
of the major things the producer of any selling ad
designs is the product "beauty shot." But
putting the addictive substance or activity in the face
of the user is just about the last thing you should do.
You are very likely to evoke the memory of the
"rush" that accompanies that use, and trigger
the one response you wish to avoid.
Harvard Medical School's Howard
Shaffer, Ph.D, C.A.S., a well-known addiction specialist
and psychotherapist told me how he discovered that a
recovering cocaine user under his care was contemplating
a return to the drug after seeing an anti-cocaine
commercial showing a line of "coke" being
inhaled through a straw. The powder had been a laid out
across a photograph of a happy family gathering. The
principal message of the strategy was obvious:
"Cocaine use can destroy a family."
But the much stronger subliminal
message received by the addict was: "if that guy was
willing to jeopardize his beautiful family just to snort
that stuff, then that 'high' has got to be amazing."
And then he began to
remember how amazing it was for him. He was turned on by
the visual, ignored the verbal anti-drug message, and was
stimulated to go out to buy some coke!
Dr. Shaffer reports that a therapy session successfully
quelled the
interest.
The physician's creed states:
"First, do no harm." That's clearly not a bad
credo for anyone preparing public service communications
as well. If you follow the basic steps in this book you
will stand a good chance of serving that principle. And
that's important, because some well- intentioned public
service campaigns do a lot of harm. However, if you are
careful, (and hopefully this book can guide you in
avoiding many of the unexpected pitfalls) you will be
able to take some solid steps toward "doing
some good."
And when you do it right, and you
start to see your campaign working and making an
important difference in the lives of the people around
you, you will have one of the most exciting and rewarding
experiences of your career.
The "Art of
Cause Marketing" is available at Amazon.com.
Click here to order.
Home
©causemarketer.com
2000
|